18. Coventry & Warwickshire
What does the STP mean for your area?
Reduction in the number of maternity and paediatric service sites as services are consolidated.
Pregnant women will be encouraged to have home births with the support of newly established and expanded community hubs.
People will be given better support to enable them to die at home rather than in hospital.
A new Acute Stroke Unit will be established at University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire (UHCW), with care at George Eliot Hospital (GEH) and Warwick Hospital ceasing.
Stroke victims will be admitted to to the UHCW unit for initial care before being moved to rehabilitation beds at GEH and Warwick and then back home with the support of the Early Supported Discharge (ESD) team.
What are the proposed aims of the STP?
- Eliminate a forecast 2020/21 deficit of £267 million;
- Reduce demand for services, through prevention and proactive care of the population;
- Remodel urgent and emergency care and review and change planned care to reduce costs;
- Reduce unit cost of provision, by delivering care at lower cost setting/s or by becoming more efficient in current setting/s;
- Improve efficiency within and across organisations;
- Make specific organisational changes in clinical pathways and services to facilitate a move towards an Accountable Care System;
- Overall the aim of the STP is to reduce the use of the acute sector and move care into the community sector.
The STP has been roundly criticised for a lack of detail on how the deficit will be cut and services maintained. Cuts are expected although yet to be announced (see further information section).
The Coventry & Warwickshire STP was the last to be published in December 2016. News stories appearing before the publication reported on the likelihood that the STP included closures of A&E and maternity units. However, upon publication, it was found that the STP contained very little in the way of detailed plans about closures.
Labour Councillor Damian Gannon, chairman of the health scrutiny committee at Coventry City Council, questioned why hospital chiefs had failed to provide details of exactly what the plans mean. He said:
“The report is completely incomprehensible to patients and the public. It raises questions about why NHS managers would want to produce a report that is so opaque.”
Professor Andy Hardy, the STP board lead, hit back at the speculation of A&E and Maternity closures in an article for the Coventry Observer, commenting:
"I can confirm that plans for a single A&E and Maternity Unit for Coventry and Warwickshire have not been discussed or agreed as part of the STP planning process.”
However, the lack of detail in the report, the lack of a concrete denial by Professor Hardy, and the unclear language used in the report means that speculation on cuts in services has continued.
A Coventry Telegraph article noted that: "The admission that "no decisions have been made" leaves plenty of scope for cuts to be announced at a later date."
According to another Coventry Telegraph article "the man leading the plan to cut more than £260 million from local NHS spending has admitted he can’t “offer any guarantees” [that services won't be closed] amid fears for the future of services."
A major criticism from local GPs of the STP is that they were not actually involved in the planning process nor allowed to see the STP prior to publication for any comment or input.
An article in the Coventry Telegraph highlighted the fact that GPs in Coventry and Warwickshire were excluded from helping consultants Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) and Professor Hardy draw up the plans.
The Coventry Local Medical Committee (LMC), which represents local GPs, said that as well as not being involved in the process, it has also been refused any foresight at the plans, despite the fact that GPs offer around 90% of health care in Coventry.
There has also been criticism of the decision by the STP board to pay consultants PwC £378,000 to draw up the plans.
At a Warwickshire County Council meeting of 13 December 2016 it was agreed that the Council could not sign up to the STP until:
- a) There has been full public engagement
- b) It has been co-produced along with the Health and Wellbeing Boards of both Warwickshire CC and Coventry CC
- c) It is rewritten in language which is accessible to the public.......'